Simple evidence proving God exists

C S Lewis Nature Reserve - 6

Image by FlickrDelusions via Flickr

This is nothing new, but it’s logical and a good reminder of the truth.

If I have a desire for something (let’s call it Nid for the moment), it shows that Nid must exist. I’m hungry, therefore I know something exists to satisfy that desire; food. I’m tired, therefore I know something exists to satisfy that desire; sleep. These are natural, inbuilt desires that we don’t need telling about – a newborn baby simply wants food, love, and sleep.

There are other desires that are artificial to a certain extent. I have a desire for the latest Xbox game, a new car, to be able to fly like Superman, and to travel to Oz…the simple difference between these two desires is that the first can be genuinely satisfied but the second cannot. I can stop being hungry, and I can stop being tired…but my desire for ‘more stuff’ simply won’t go away. Just look at the wealthy people we see every day in the news – broken marriages, depression, alcoholism, yet they have a whole bunch of stuff we desire. It doesn’t add up…

But the desire still exists, and there is not a single case of an innate desire for something that does not exist. Something inside us all simply knows that infinite joy, peace, and beauty is desirable…but it’s certainly never going to happen on this earth. Here’s C.S. Lewis’ useful summary:

Creatures are not born with desires unless satisfaction for these desires exists. A baby feels hunger; well, there is such a thing as food. A duckling wants to swim; well, there is such a thing as water. Men feel sexual desire; well, there is such a thing as sex. If I find in myself a desire which no experience in this world can satisfy, the most probable explanation is that I was made for another world.

A good, more detailed look at this is over here, together with answers to common objections.

Ignoring it won’t make it go away

The Official Medallion of the British Anti-Sla...Yes, I know, my eyes tend to glaze over too. I’m not quoting this entire article for no reason; please read it all.

Srey Pov’s family sold her to a brothel when she was 6 years old. She was unaware of sex but soon found out: A Western pedophile purchased her virginity, she said, and the brothel tied her naked and spread-eagled on a bed so that he could rape her.

“I was so scared,” she recalled. “I was crying and asking, ‘Why are you doing this to me?’ ”

After that, the girl was in huge demand because she was so young. Some 20 customers raped her nightly, she remembers. And the brothel twice stitched her vagina closed so that she could be resold as a virgin. This agonizingly painful practice is common in Asian brothels, where customers sometimes pay hundreds of dollars to rape a virgin.

Most girls who have been trafficked, whether in New York or in Cambodia, eventually surrender. They are degraded and terrified, and they doubt their families or society will accept them again. But somehow Srey Pov refused to give in.

Repeatedly, she tried to escape the brothel but she said that each time she was caught and brutally punished with beatings and electric shocks. The brothel, like many in Cambodia, also had a punishment cell to break the will of rebellious girls.

As Srey Pov remembers it (and other girls tell similar stories), each time she rebelled she was locked naked in the darkness in a barrel half-full of sewage, replete with vermin and scorpions that stung her regularly. I asked how long she was punished this way, thinking perhaps an hour or two.

“The longest?” she remembered. “It was a week.”

Customers are, of course, the reason trafficking continues, and many of them honestly think that the girls are in the brothels voluntarily. Many are, of course. But smiles are not always what they seem. Srey Pov even remembers flirting to avoid being beaten.

“We smile on the outside,” she said, “but inside we are crying.”

Yet this is a story with a triumphant ending. At age 9, Srey Pov was able to dart away from the brothel and outrun the guard. She found her way to a shelter run by Somaly Mam, an anti-trafficking activist who herself was prostituted as a child. Somaly now runs the Somaly Mam Foundation to fight human trafficking in Southeast Asia: She’s the one who led the brothel raid that I recounted in my last column.

In Somaly’s shelter, Srey Pov learned English and blossomed. Now 19, Srey Pov can even imagine eventually having a boyfriend.

“Before I didn’t like men because they hit me and raped me,” she reflected. “But now I think that not all men are bad. If I find a good man, I can marry him.”

Somaly is creating an army of young women like Srey Pov who have been rescued from the brothels: well-educated and determined to defeat human trafficking. Over the years, I’ve watched these women and girls make a difference, and they’re self-replicating.

In my last column, I described a frightened seventh-grade Vietnamese girl who was rescued in a brothel raid that Somaly and I participated in. That raid in the town of Anlong Veng has already had an impact, for six more brothels in the area have closed because of public attention and fear that they could be next. And the seventh-grade girl is recovering from her trauma at a shelter run by Somaly, where a girl named Lithiya has taken her under her wing.

Lithiya, now 15, is one of my favorites in “Somaly’s army,” perhaps because she wants to be a journalist and has taught herself astoundingly good English. Trafficked at age 9 from Vietnam, Lithiya was locked inside a brothel for years before she climbed over a wall and escaped. Now a ninth grader, she is ranked No. 1 in her class.

Srey Pov, Lithiya and Somaly encountered a form of oppression that echoes 19th-century slavery. But the scale is larger today. By my calculations, at least 10 times as many girls are now trafficked into brothels annually as African slaves were transported to the New World in the peak years of the trans-Atlantic slave trade.

So for those of you doubtful that “modern slavery” really is an issue for the new international agenda, think of Srey Pov — and multiply her by millions. If what such girls experience isn’t slavery, that word has no meaning. It’s time for a 21st-century abolitionist movement in the U.S. and around the world.

Multi-functionality

An MP3 CD player (Philips Expanium)

Image via Wikipedia

It turns out I’m not the only one who likes to have a rant every so often. Sitting at my desk at work the other day and the guy next to me suddenly went ‘aargh!’ Bit of an over-reaction but he didn’t like what some website had told him.

Apparently, the website suggested that people enjoy listening to music using their smartphone, but he doesn’t want to; he has an mp3 player and would rather listen to his music on that.

Now, I don’t have an issue with him using his mp3 player to listen to music, but if his phone can do exactly the same job at the same quality, doesn’t it make sense for him to use his phone for that, and not have to bother carrying round his mp3 player?

Perhaps I’m addicted to multi-functional devices. My phone doubles up as my calendar, contact list, wallet, Bible, calculator, radio, camera, mp3 player, news channel, alarm clock, torch, notepad, map and satnav, and wireless router. And that’s not to mention the wealth of time-wasting games and internet websites, audio and video available 24/7/365. What would have needed a small car to transport around 10 years ago fits into my pocket, and surely that’s a good thing in our world where productivity is king?

But there’s also something in me that really likes my colleague’s attitude towards keeping  things segregated. Of course it’s useful to permanently be carrying a map, GPS receiver and torch in case I get lost in the middle of Hyde Park in the middle of the night (and that only happened once), but does it at the same time make me so reliant on my phone that (a) I’m losing the ability to think for myself and plan ahead, and (b) if I lose my phone it’s as if the sky’s fallen?

Thought for today: is multi-functionality a good thing or a bad thing?

Why we do anything at all

These are smoked "country style" por...

Image via Wikipedia

I was out with one of my friends recently getting something to eat, and she said she wouldn’t eat a particular dish because it had pork in it, and her religion (Islam) didn’t allow her to eat pork.

Aside from just feeling sorry for her (sausage rolls, scotch eggs, toad in the hole, pigs in blankets, spare ribs, sausages and mash, pork chops, YUMMY!) I was genuinely interested in why she wouldn’t allow herself the pleasure of a lovely bacon roll. Her response: ‘It’s my religion.’

‘Well,’ I said, ‘I know that, but why is it in your religion?’

Turns out she didn’t know, all she knew was that God would judge her if she ate pork. Seemed a bit weird.

Now, I’m pretty certain that Muslims in general do have a reason why they won’t eat pork, but I think I’d need to be convinced to intentionally avoid something that would be a nice experience. I don’t think I do anything just because ‘it’s my religion.’

Then again, I reckon this could be misused; I’m meant to start work at 9:30am each day but I don’t think anyone’s ever sat me down and explained why I must. I think I could produce the same quality of work if I took a shorter lunch break and started at 10am instead…but just because I don’t understand the reason why doesn’t mean I shouldn’t simply obey in this context.

Hmm…any thoughts?

Hell isn’t an evil place

Dante and Virgil in Hell

Image via Wikipedia

Hell is something that people don’t like talking about…so people don’t talk about it. The problem with this is that the only people who talk about hell are therefore people who want to talk about their opinion on hell, and probably don’t actually know much truth about it.

A couple of misconceptions about hell that are pretty much accepted are that (1) hell is evil, and (2) the devil punishes people in hell. Both are wrong. Here’s why:

Hell isn’t evil

Simply by using the word ‘evil’ we’re forced to ask what we mean by ‘evil’, and if we’re talking about hell it’s logical for us to bring in an all-seeing, all-knowing God who is good, and therefore defines ‘good’ and ‘evil’. If God has determined that the just punishment for people who commit sin is an eternity in conscious torment, then by definition that simply cannot be evil, it must be good.

It’s a logical impossibility for hell to be an evil place.

The devil doesn’t punish anyone

Continuing from the logic above, the devil is by definition evil, and the Bible is really clear about the fact that the access all areas pass to hell has been reserved for him. God will punish him, and God will punish everyone else.

The easy analogy is that of a gaol. The Government sets the laws, then punishes people according to the laws they’ve broken; if I do the crime, I do the time. The guy who influenced me and enabled me to do the crime is also guilty, and I’ll see him in there. It’s not run by the evil people, it’s run by the Government, and its existence speaks volumes about the Government’s power and authority.

The sterotypical image of Satan looking on while bad people are prodded with red-winged creatures’ tridents is unbiblical and illogical. Yes, hell is eternal conscious torment but Satan will be more peronally aware of that than any other inmate, and its existence will glorify God forever.

Man enough to love a real woman

The Dating Game

Image via Wikipedia

I think my journey of meeting and getting to know Anna, making an absolute fool of myself, then marrying her was more a story of my impatience and impulsiveness than any genuine humility, but I enjoyed and agree with the sentiment behind this article about dating.

Here are a couple of snippets:

I was like a lot of single, Christian guys. I just wanted to follow God’s will in finding a wife — that’s all — oh yeah, and I also wanted a modest version of the Cosmo girl. And, well, I didn’t want her to be too needy. Oh, and she also needed to be smart — really smart — but not, like, so smart that she made me feel stupid. And, of course, she needed to be spiritually mature (you know, like me). And one more thing: I wanted her to have a cool and fun personality (whatever that meant).

…I met my wife at a party on Capitol Hill. Unlike before, I didn’t think, I’ll consider taking that girl out. I thought, I wonder if she would go out with me. I cautiously introduced myself, and as we talked, I found myself focusing on her qualities, rather than mentally trying to ferret out her deficiencies.

I’d recommend the whole thing.

One what, three whos

Golden squiggles

Image by Steve-h via Flickr

A little thought to break us into the weekend…in the West it’s pretty much part of culture that God is one. Popular TV shows happily refer to God as existing but rarely talk about there being multiple gods.

And I think that this cultural pressure has actually meant that the church doesn’t understand the concept of God as well as we could. Christians believe in one God in three persons – the Holy Trinity. But I think that we find ourselves relating to God more as one, and less as three. But he is three and one.

The Father is not the Son. The Son is not the Spirit. The Bible mentions each individually on multiple occasions without ever suggesting that God is not one. So it’s pretty odd that we hear people praying, ‘Oh yeah, Father Lord Jesus…’ Hang on, who are you talking to?

I think our concept of God has the danger of not being ‘one God in three persons’ but ‘one God with multiple personalities’ – not the same thing!

Without wanting to stray into heresy, would the church in the West do well to attempt to think of God more as three and less as one, at least to tip the balance in the right direction? God is fully one, but he is also fully three.

Discuss.

Aiming for colour-blindness

 
Side-by-side comparison of two images of apple...
Image via Wikipedia

Let’s start with something that we know: racism is wrong. I’ll leave you to debate amongst yourselves how we know it’s wrong.

Oh, ok, I’ll get involved, but not until after I’ve written this post.

I recently read a story by a lady telling of her dream of a colour-blind world, one in which people wouldn’t judge those like her, who are happy in interracial relationships. And on the surface, a colour-blind world sounds wonderful:

Perhaps it’s not realistic to envision a colour-blind world anytime soon. But we can work toward the achievement of an honest, common understanding by promoting acceptance and tolerance.

Lovely. But, I think, boring in real life. I completely agree, let’s not judge anyone based on their skin colour, but my life would certainly be less interesting if I were blind to race altogether! I live just down the road from a town which Wikipedia tells me has one of the largest concentrations of South Asian people outside of the Indian sub-continent. And the smells, colours, and tastes of Little India are wonderful – I’m getting hungry just thinking about it!

This isn’t to say that Indian food is good and the rest are bad; I don’t think my body would cope with those flavours every day (let alone the calories in jalebi!)…but when combined with a good balanced diet of Italian, African, East Asian and good hearty British food our cuisine is surely better…

If an orchestra were to play an entire concert in unison I’m sure it would sound great, but it would ultimately be pretty boring. But if that orchestra all played different, complementary notes and rhythms we’d have a beautiful evening on our hands! I’m all for racial equality, but I think I’m equally all for racial and cultural diversity – let’s not aim for one at the expense of the other.

Above reproach

DSC_7984

Image by sean.flynn via Flickr

A couple of similar news stories are making headlines both sides of the pond at the moment:

Joe Paterno, head coach of the Penn State University American football team for the past 46 years, was fired for not having done enough in relation to sex abuse charges that have been filed against an assistant coach. Ealing Abbey has been in the papers in relation to the whole Roman Catholic child abuse scandal – priests there have been arrested and have even gone into hiding, believed to be in Europe.

What’s interested me has been my own reaction to the stories; apart from being obviously upset for those directly affected, I’ve caught myself thinking that these issues would have been avoided if certain situations had simply been banned outright – if the priests had never been in a situation in which they were alone with a child everyone would have been alright.

But then again, where should you draw the line? Not alone with children, but on their 18th Birthday suddenly it’s ok? Well, that’s just silly. Safer to say that a priest should never be alone with anyone.

A couple of weeks ago I was talking in relation to 1 Timothy 3:2 – I’m not an elder but the Bible tells us to imitate elders, so when Paul tells Timothy that ‘an elder must be above reproach’ I think that’s a good value for us to strive for. One way I’ve addressed this personally is that I avoid if at all possible being alone with a lady, to avoid even a hint of a compromising situation…but I’d never even thought there would be a problem with me being alone with a child, or being alone with a man. Looking at the news stories above, it’s actually these two situations that are the key ones.

Taking this to its logical conclusion, it’s clearly bad if a parent sexually abuses their own children, so perhaps everyone in any position of influence should never be alone with their own child?

What I’m basically saying is that there’s no way to force sin of any kind to just stop – people will always find ways around anything. The answer is the person and work of Jesus, who was without any sin, yet became sin for us. The guilty priests weren’t looking at Jesus; if they had been, none of that would have happened.